Electric scooter comparison
Compare the ANYHILL UM-1 and the Inokim Quick 4 Super
Review the specs, pricing, and rider-focused details for the ANYHILL UM-1 versus the Inokim Quick 4 Super. Every matchup is sourced from Levy's internal database so you can make a confident choice.

Scooter A
ANYHILL UM-1
Range 11.8 mi • Top speed 15.5 mph
$599

Scooter B
Inokim Quick 4 Super
Range 24.6 mi • Top speed 23.8 mph
$1,499
Specification breakdown
| Spec | ANYHILL UM-1 | Inokim Quick 4 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Range (mi) | 11.8 mi | 24.6 mi |
| Top speed (mph) | 15.5 mph | 23.8 mph |
| Weight (lbs) | 30.6 lbs | 45.6 lbs |
| Motor power (W) | 350 W | 600 W |
| Battery capacity (Wh) | 281 Wh | 832 Wh |
| Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Tires | Pneumatic | Pneumatic |
| Waterproof rating | IP54 | None |
| Suspension | None | Dual Rubber |
| Price (USD) | $599 | $1,499 |
ANYHILL UM-1 Vs Inokim Quick 4 Super Electric Scooters: Decoding Differences
While the electric scooter market is saturated with a smorgasbord of options, when it comes down to the two distinguished choices i.e., ANYHILL UM-1 and Inokim Quick 4 Super, discerning customers might get caught in a dilemma.
Starting with performance, the ANYHILL UM-1 paves the way with its impressive 800W motor, which translates to a top speed of about 40 km/h. Whereas, the Inokim Quick 4 Super equips a 600W motor, reaching a top speed of 35 km/h.
When it comes to the battery, once fully charged, the UM-1 affords the rider 40-45 km of range, depending on various factors. In contrast, the Quick 4 Super exudes flying colors in this aspect, offering an impressive range of 45-55 km with a fully charged battery.
Taking design aesthetics and comfort into consideration, the UM-1 showcases ergonomic design with adjustable handlebars and armored with puncture-resistant 10-inch tires, ensuring a smoother and safer ride. The Quick 4 Super gives a tough competition with its futuristic aura, equiped with intuitive thumb controls and rider-focused details such as auto LED lights with sleek 10-inch pneumatic tires, which render a smooth urban commute.
In terms of carrying capacity, both can comfortably accommodate a rider weighing up to 120 kg. However, the UM-1 steals the show with its superior hill climbing ability, effortlessly climbing slopes up to a 25-degree incline, as opposed to the Quick 4’s 15-degree incline capacity.
Lastly, taking into consideration the price, the UM-1 is aimed at budget-conscious riders delivering a great performance-to-cost ratio. The Quick 4, on the other hand, being a premium model, seems to be a tad pricey but justifies its cost with its advanced features and design comforts.
Ultimately the preference between ANYHILL UM-1 and Inokim Quick 4 Super would ride on individual rider's lifestyle, usage requirements and of course the budget.
Keep researching with Levy
Browse thousands more matchups or reach out to our team for personalized scooter advice.


