top of page
Compare the ANYHILL UM-1 and the Inokim Quick 4 Super
When comparing electric scooters, often times advertised ranges don't match up with reality. We included metrics from real-world road tests. Plus, raw specs such as battery capacity and motor wattage provide unbiased performance metrics when evaluating electric scooters.
Use code SCNEWCUST15 for 15% off ALL scooters through month-end. Redeem here.
ANYHILL UM-1
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9858b2_929c4e02b1564df385e5b6c01d063c6f~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_300,h_300,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Untitled-1.png)
Inokim Quick 4 Super
ANYHILL UM-1 Vs Inokim Quick 4 Super Electric Scooters: Decoding Differences
While the electric scooter market is saturated with a smorgasbord of options, when it comes down to the two distinguished choices i.e., ANYHILL UM-1 and Inokim Quick 4 Super, discerning customers might get caught in a dilemma.
Starting with performance, the ANYHILL UM-1 paves the way with its impressive 800W motor, which translates to a top speed of about 40 km/h. Whereas, the Inokim Quick 4 Super equips a 600W motor, reaching a top speed of 35 km/h.
When it comes to the battery, once fully charged, the UM-1 affords the rider 40-45 km of range, depending on various factors. In contrast, the Quick 4 Super exudes flying colors in this aspect, offering an impressive range of 45-55 km with a fully charged battery.
Taking design aesthetics and comfort into consideration, the UM-1 showcases ergonomic design with adjustable handlebars and armored with puncture-resistant 10-inch tires, ensuring a smoother and safer ride. The Quick 4 Super gives a tough competition with its futuristic aura, equiped with intuitive thumb controls and rider-focused details such as auto LED lights with sleek 10-inch pneumatic tires, which render a smooth urban commute.
In terms of carrying capacity, both can comfortably accommodate a rider weighing up to 120 kg. However, the UM-1 steals the show with its superior hill climbing ability, effortlessly climbing slopes up to a 25-degree incline, as opposed to the Quick 4’s 15-degree incline capacity.
Lastly, taking into consideration the price, the UM-1 is aimed at budget-conscious riders delivering a great performance-to-cost ratio. The Quick 4, on the other hand, being a premium model, seems to be a tad pricey but justifies its cost with its advanced features and design comforts.
Ultimately the preference between ANYHILL UM-1 and Inokim Quick 4 Super would ride on individual rider's lifestyle, usage requirements and of course the budget.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/855cc0_e23e880fee7f4beb90a4ce2b91b3ba5a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_20,h_10,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Path%201_2x.png)
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/855cc0_e23e880fee7f4beb90a4ce2b91b3ba5a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_20,h_10,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Path%201_2x.png)
bottom of page