top of page
Compare the ANYHILL UM-2 and the Apollo City Pro
When comparing electric scooters, often times advertised ranges don't match up with reality. We included metrics from real-world road tests. Plus, raw specs such as battery capacity and motor wattage provide unbiased performance metrics when evaluating electric scooters.
Use code SCNEWCUST15 for 15% off ALL scooters through month-end. Redeem here.
ANYHILL UM-2
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/9858b2_929c4e02b1564df385e5b6c01d063c6f~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_300,h_300,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Untitled-1.png)
Apollo City Pro
THE ANYHILL UM-2 VS THE APOLLO CITY PRO: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
The world of electric scooters is evolving rapidly and two models lead the way: The ANYHILL UM-2 and the Apollo City Pro. Here, we undertake a detailed analysis of their features, performance, and overall user experiences.
Starting with the ANYHILL UM-2, this scooter stands out owing to its sleek design and impressive power. Powered by a 350W motor, it can travel up to 25mph at maximum power. Range-wise, it can cover about 15-20 miles on a single charge, which makes it ideal for neighborhood trips and short commutes. However, its chief attraction lies in its innovative LED display and unique folding system, making it compact and user-friendly.
The Apollo City Pro, on the other hand, comes with an enhanced 600W motor and can reach speeds of up to 28mph. It offers a more extensive range of up to 28 miles, giving it an edge over long-distance travel. What sets the City Pro apart is its high-end hydraulic suspension system and pneumatic tires, which promise smooth rides even on rough terrains. Its integrated LED lights and LCD display add to the user's convenience but it's not as compact as the UM-2 when folded.
Both scooters boast impressive features, but clear differences emerge in their performance and usability. The ANYHILL UM-2 leans towards design innovation and portability, suitable for urban riders making short trips. In contrast, the Apollo City Pro is more performance-oriented, with higher speed and range, geared towards those needing longer, comfortable rides.
Costing is another significant difference. The ANYHILL UM-2 is a more affordable choice compared to the Apollo City Pro. However, given its higher performance specifications, the price difference becomes understandable for the City Pro.
In conclusion, the optimal choice between the ANYHILL UM-2 and Apollo City Pro depends largely upon the users’ needs. While the UM-2 serves the purpose of affordability and compactness, the Apollo City Pro leads where power, range, and ride comfort are the prime factors.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/855cc0_e23e880fee7f4beb90a4ce2b91b3ba5a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_20,h_10,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Path%201_2x.png)
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/855cc0_e23e880fee7f4beb90a4ce2b91b3ba5a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_20,h_10,al_c,q_85,usm_2.00_1.00_0.00,enc_auto/Path%201_2x.png)
bottom of page